Boasberg's Coincidental Contempt Timeline

Julie Kelly, Substack

The Trump administration insists Boasberg’s verbal orders are not controlling; case law and

common practice appear to support the administration’s argument. But Boasberg, of course, is the sketchy one. Since setting the contempt trap on March 15, he has publicly advanced the notion the administration did not obey his orders, going so far as to recently demand the names of Trump officials who may have listened to the March 15 hearing and suggest he would seek depositions to determine who knew what when. Talk about contempt.